Re: proposed conlang database

>Message: 8
>    Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:55:13 -0800
>    From: Garrett Jones <alkaline@...>
>Subject: Re: proposed conlang database
>
>http://conlang.alkaline.org
>
>Is Lahabic fully developed now? Meaning, have you fully decided on all the
>grammar, and have most of the primary vocabulary decided on, and are only
>adding more esoteric vocabulary now? Or are you still messing around with
>grammar and changing words around? This category is more of the status in
>the real world, as opposed to how it's used in the fictional world.
>
>http://conlang.alkaline.org
I have decided on all the grammatical situations I can think of (obviously,
I may have missed something). The primary vocabulary is decided (with the
caveat that I can't always 'remember' it, since languages studied for grades
take up most of that space). I consider Lahabic a very poetic language, and
therefore likely to generate new, analyzable words at the drop of a hat.



_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.