Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: [wEr\ Ar\ ju: fr6m] ?

From:Almaran Dungeonmaster <dungeonmaster@...>
Date:Monday, November 12, 2001, 17:16
Christophe Grandsire wrote:

> En réponse à Almaran Dungeonmaster <dungeonmaster@...> about soft
vs. hard "g":
> > > That's dialect from Limburg ([`lIm.b6.r@G]) or Brabant ([`bra.bAnt]), > > and > > not commonly used in Hollands dutch (spoken in the big cities). > > What do you call Eindhoven then? :))
A major city, actually the 5th city of The Netherlands, but not commonly considered one of the big cities (Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague, Utrecht). You have to draw the line somewhere...
>> Only southeners used the "soft g" as we call it... > > A mistake I've seen commonly among Dutch people is this > misconception. > First, > if you add the Flemish, who also have a soft g, you get quite a > lot of people > pronouncing the g "soft".
Which is besides the point, because I was talking about the Dutch people. I never said anything about the Flemish. They have soft "G" as default indeed.
> Second, I've listened to many Dutch people from many > parts of the Netherlands, and the only one I've heard until now > that really has > a hard g is from Friesland! All the others, despite their claims, > naturally > pronounce soft g's, except at the end of words (where consonnants > get unvoiced > anyway).
The hard-soft distinction is not merely a matter of voicing! I am still hearing a difference between the "g" as pronounced by Limburgers and those pronounced by other Dutch people (mainly Hollanders, i.e. people from the North- and South Holland provinces). Part of my family is from Belgium, and half the others are from Brabant. I know the difference between my 'g' and theirs, as I speak both dialects. The southern "g" is way more frontal and causes less friction in the throat. I think the real difference between hard and soft 'g' may be in other qualities such as place of articulation and not just voicing (hard "g" being more guttural).
> And all grammars of Dutch I've read consider the > so-called soft g as standard, and the hard g as a peculiarity > of some
Northern dialects Well, Hollands is the common form of Dutch, for historical reasons, and because most of the population lives in the Holland provinces. What we usually call ABN ("algemeen beschaafd Nederlands", or "general civilized Dutch") is most similar to the common forms found among Holland dialects.
> (the same for 'ij' pronounced /Ej/ or /aj/).
Yes, the /aj/ (Rotterdam), /Ej/ (Amsterdam) or even /E:/(The Hague) pronounciation for /Ei/ is definitely non-standard. Maarten