Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Triggeriness ...

From:Rik Roots <rik@...>
Date:Saturday, December 13, 2003, 16:44
On Friday 12 Dec 2003 11:09 pm, you wrote:
> Andreas Johansson wrote: > > If there's > > some bizarre language where all verbs are transitive, I can't see how you > > could classify it as acc or erg. > > What a fascinating idea. Completely counter-Real- World-as-We-Know-It. >
Gevey comes scarily close to this (I think). Let's try some translations:
> How would it express such concepts as: > --He died. (?[unknown S] killed him) >
Ke ta'savente Ke - he/she/it nominative Saven - spatial/temporal action (the assumption is that people or animals die somewhere) ta' - at, in Let's add a direct object He died in his bed Ke zhuusyuu ken gribdal savente zhuus - on top of ken - his/her/its gribdaluu (yuu gribdal) - bed The dissociative form of the noun (yuu gribdal) is the accusative form. So, in Gevey terms "bed" is being used as a direct object (with the preposition incorporated into the dissociated word - zhuusyuu gribdal) The locative oblique form "in his bed" (zhuu'gribdaluups ken) is definitely not used by Gevey speakers in this context.
> --That glass is broken. (?[unknown S] broke it) >
1. [Somebody] broke that glass Yuu tuzaa striv shaablate 2. That glass broke Strivuu tuzaa seduu shablanti 3. That glass is broken Strifshabluu tuzaa bekasuu Strifshabluu tuzaa sekasuu 4. That broken glass Strifshabluu tuzaa Strivuu (yuu striv) - beaker, glass Shablan - break Sekan - be, become Bekan - be, remain Tuzaa - that in 1, "broke" is in the active voice and "glass" is the direct object. The subject of the sentence is missing in 2, "glass" is the subject. However, because applicative nouns are not allowed to use the active voice, "broke" is using the incidental voice instead. For 3 and 4, when a verb is used to modify a noun, it gets incorporated into the noun. In 3, we use the sekan/bekan verbs to indicate whether the breaking is a new occurance or an older occurance (sekan and bekan are "equative" verbs which do allow applicative nouns to use them in the active voice).
> --I'm cold. (?cold [affects] me) > --The soup is cold. (???) >
Te skugutle sekase Huuwuu skugutluu sekasuu Te - I (nominative) Huuwuu (yuu huuw) - food Skug - cold The modifier skug is using the compliment infix - the closest we get to a modifier acting as a direct object in Gevey. Thus all-in-all, Gevey does come close to implying that most of its verbs need a minimum of 2 arguments, and seems to show that intransitive verbs are rare. Rik