Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: NATLANG: English Homework - Keeping alive languages of minorities?

From:Thomas Wier <trwier@...>
Date:Monday, March 7, 2005, 6:09
I presume you meant to send this to the list.  Damn CMail!

Andreas wrote:
>Quoting Thomas Wier <trwier@...>: > >> Carsten wrote: > >> > But now go and tell the currently about half a >> > | billion citizens of the European Union to give up their >> > | language and perhaps even parts of their culture. >> >> It's somewhat less than that. And the argument isn't >> that the citizens of the EU should give up their culture, >> but about what practical measures should be adopted to >> allow them to communicate with one another. The question >> is emphatically not about one language or the other, but >> which should be first among equals. > >European history would certainly suggest that political unification with a >common official language is a bad thing for cultural and linguistic diversity >in the long term.
But that's simply not true. France was a relatively unified monarchy after their victory in the Hundred Years' War, and had a de facto standard tongue since at least when the Northern Renaissance set in, but it was only after particular language policies were instituted by Nationalists during and after the Revolution that most of the minority languages began their steep decline. England gave even less autonomy to conquered regions like Wales and Ireland, but in both cases the spur for language shift came about only when Welsh/Irish land was directly colonized by Anglophones, and policies like Sally mentioned, that their decline began, centuries after the initial conquest had occurred. What about Spain? What about the Hellenistic world? There are just too many counterexamples to your claim.
>I'd also put a question mark at the applicability of the notion of a "first >among equals" in this context. If one language is granted a superior offical >position, it's not first among equals; it's superior.
Look, it's really simplistic to say that one language being used in common will automatically uproot others. There are countless examples of linguae francae being used stably in the context of other languages. Greek in Ptolemaic Egypt; English and French in much of modern Africa; Latin in medieval Europe. It's a red herring to suggest that if the EU adopted English (or some other languages like French or German) that these languages would reduce the overall language diversity. ========================================================================= Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally, Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of 1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter. Chicago, IL 60637