Re: Unicode yogh?
| From: | Tristan Alexander McLeay <anstouh@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Saturday, November 17, 2001, 13:58 |
|---|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, And Rosta wrote:
> Does Unicode contain a yogh, and, if so, has anyone spotted it
> in Lucida Sans Unicode? I'm having to use an ezh, and it looks
> a bit yucky.
Indeed there is. However, LSU was designed as Unicode 1.x (I think. Maybe
it was Unicode 2.x) but the yogh wasn't added till 3.something. It's not
in Arial Unicode either, I don't think. Go to your favourite website at
http://www.unicode.org/ and Unicode Charts --> Latin Extended B and you'll
get to see where it is too (both upper and lower case versions exist).
Apropos of Unicode, if one is using a sans serif font that doesn't have
the hook on a l/c a, is there any way to distinguish b/s X-Sampa [a] and
[A]?
Tristan
anstouh@yahoo.com.au
War doesn't prove who's right, just who's left.
- BSD Games' Fortune
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE79m0lcal4LMWSmQcRAhSiAKC87N1OSnuNIAk9Q4+ov5IOlJ5lQgCdHhts
RUkIcCx7Y4ahOQHC94/EDAk=
=zRCh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Replies