Re: Hey, what Su problem?

On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, jogloran wrote:

> Adam Walker <dreamertwo@H...> wrote:
> <<
> Here's my proposal.  When replying to Su Cheng Zhong from this point
> on,
> let's reply only in our respective conlangs!  That way we can
> practice our
> grammars, work out some needed vocab and confuse him at the same
> time.
> >>
>
> Great idea, like a language embargo, right? The pitfall is that we
> won't be able to understand each other; most of us don't know how to
> speak others' conlangs...
Well, we could add an interlinear.  Easy to do with Mujai; it's isolating.
:)  Or analytic.  Whichever you like.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Prurio modo viri qui in arbore pilosa est.
                        ~~Elvis

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~