Re: IntroductionThanks for the welcome to Conlang. I am very glad I was told about i

>I have to say, I may not be able to stay on if it goes into another huge
>batch of off-topic discussion--it literally took me hours to wade through
>it, the
>first few days I was on.
>I am now ruthlessly deleting all offtopic messages without reading
>them--many
>are interesting in themselves, but I just don't have time to deal with
>them:
>I am on several other lists; before joining conlang it took up to an hour a
>day to keep up--reading all conlang messages doubled that). Fortunately,
>the
>proportion of relevant material has increased since the survey and I hope
>it will
>stay that way.
Welcome.

I doubt there is any list which has a large body of subscribers on which I
even attempt to read all the posts. I tend to delete entries to threads
which have no interest to me, whether OT or not, sampling periodically along
a thread to see if the focus has shifted to something of interest to me.

>About myself and my conlangs: I am 53 years old, and began creating my
>first
>major conlang in 1962 when I was12. (Sara in her paper at Kalamazoo noted
>many
Are you willing to share samples of what you consider to be key features
from your top 5 conlangs?

_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail